Unicode Regular Expressions :
Unicode is a character set that aims to define all characters and glyphs from all human languages, living and dead. With more and more software being required to support multiple languages, or even just any language, Unicode has been strongly gaining popularity in recent years. Using different character sets for different languages is simply too cumbersome for programmers and users.
Unfortunately, Unicode brings its own requirements and pitfalls when it comes to regular expressions. Of the regex flavors discussed in this tutorial, Java, XML and the .NET framework use Unicode-based regex engines. Perl supports Unicode starting with version 5.6. PCRE can optionally be compiled with Unicode support. Note that PCRE is far less flexible in what it allows for the \p tokens, despite its name "Perl-compatible". The PHP preg functions, which are based on PCRE, support Unicode when the /u option is appended to the regular expression.
RegexBuddy's regex engine is fully Unicode-based starting with version 2.0.0. RegexBuddy 1.x.x did not support Unicode at all. PowerGREP uses the same Unicode regex engine starting with version 3.0.0. Earlier versions would convert Unicode files to ANSI prior to grepping with an 8-bit (i.e. non-Unicode) regex engine. EditPad Pro supports Unicode starting with version 6.0.0.
Characters, Code Points and Graphemes or How Unicode Makes a Mess of Things :
Most people would consider à a single character. Unfortunately, it need not be depending on the meaning of the word "character".
All Unicode regex engines discussed in this tutorial treat any single Unicode code point as a single character. When this tutorial tells you that the dot matches any single character, this translates into Unicode parlance as "the dot matches any single Unicode code point". In Unicode, à can be encoded as two code points: U+0061 (a)followed by U+0300 (grave accent). In this situation, . applied to à will match a without the accent. ^.$ will fail to match, since the string consists of two code points. ^..$ matches à.
The Unicode code point U+0300 (grave accent) is a combining mark. Any code point that is not a combining mark can be followed by any number of combining marks. This sequence, like U+0061 U+0300 above, is displayed as a single grapheme on the screen.
Unfortunately, à can also be encoded with the single Unicode code point U+00E0 (a with grave accent). The reason for this duality is that many historical character sets encode "a with grave accent" as a single character. Unicode's designers thought it would be useful to have a one-on-one mapping with popular legacy character sets, in addition to the Unicode way of separating marks and base letters (which makes arbitrary combinations not supported by legacy character sets possible).
How to Match a Single Unicode Grapheme :
Matching a single grapheme, whether it's encoded as a single code point, or as multiple code points using combining marks, is easy in Perl, RegexBuddy and PowerGREP: simply use \X. You can consider \X the Unicode version of the dot in regex engines that use plain ASCII. There is one difference, though: \X always matches line break characters, whereas the dot does not match line break characters unless you enable the dot matches newline matching mode.
Java and .NET unfortunately do not support \X (yet). Use \P{M}\p{M}*+ or (?>\P{M}\p{M}*) as a reasonably close substitute. To match any number of graphemes, use (?>\P{M}\p{M}*)+ as a substitute for \X+.
Matching a Specific Code Point :
To match a specific Unicode code point, use \uFFFF where FFFF is the hexadecimal number of the code point you want to match. You must always specify 4 hexadecimal digits E.g. \u00E0 matches à, but only when encoded as a single code point U+00E0.
In Java, the regex token \uFFFF only matches the specified code point, even when you turned on canonical equivalence. However, the same syntax \uFFFF is also used to insert Unicode characters into literal strings in the Java source code. Pattern.compile("\u00E0") will match both the single-code-point and double-code-point encodings of à, while Pattern.compile("\\u00E0") matches only the single-code-point version. Remember that when writing a regex as a Java string literal, backslashes must be escaped. The former Java code compiles the regex à, while the latter compiles \u00E0. Depending on what you're doing, the difference may be significant.
Unicode Character Properties :
In addition to complications, Unicode also brings new possibilities. One is that each Unicode character belongs to a certain category. You can match a single character belonging to a particular category with \p{}. You can match a single character not belonging to a particular category with \P{}.
Again, "character" really means "Unicode code point". \p{L} matches a single code point in the category "letter". If your input string is à encoded as U+0061 U+0300, it matches a without the accent. If the input is à encoded as U+00E0, it matches à with the accent. The reason is that both the code points U+0061 (a) and U+00E0 (à) are in the category "letter", while U+0300 is in the category "mark".
You should now understand why \P{M}\p{M}* is the equivalent of \X. \P{M} matches a code point that is not a combining mark, while \p{M}* matches zero or more code points that are combining marks. To match a letter including any diacritics, use \p{L}\p{M}*. This last regex will always match à, regardless of how it is encoded.
In addition to the standard notation, \p{L}, Java, Perl, PCRE and the JGsoft engine allow you to use the shorthand \pL. The shorthand only works with single-letter Unicode properties. \pLl is not the equivalent of \p{Ll}. It is the equivalent of \p{L}l which matches Al or àl or any Unicode letter followed by a literal l.
Perl and the JGsoft engine also support the longhand \p{Letter}. You can find a complete list of all Unicode properties below. You may omit the underscores or use hyphens or spaces instead.
- \p{L} or \p{Letter}: any kind of letter from any language.
- \p{M} or \p{Mark}: a character intended to be combined with another character (e.g. accents, umlauts, enclosing boxes, etc.).
- \p{Z} or \p{Separator}: any kind of whitespace or invisible separator.
- \p{S} or \p{Symbol}: math symbols, currency signs, dingbats, box-drawing characters, etc..
- \p{N} or \p{Number}: any kind of numeric character in any script.
- \p{P} or \p{Punctuation}: any kind of punctuation character. <-- 常用
- \p{C} or \p{Other}: invisible control characters and unused code points.
Unicode Scripts :
The Unicode standard places each assigned code point (character) into one script. A script is a group of code points used by a particular human writing system. Some scripts like Thai correspond with a single human language. Other scripts like Latin (\p{Latin}) span multiple languages.
Some languages are composed of multiple scripts. There is no Japanese Unicode script. Instead, Unicode offers the Hiragana, Katakana, Han and Latin scripts that Japanese documents are usually composed of.
A special script is the Common script. This script contains all sorts of characters that are common to a wide range of scripts. It includes all sorts of punctuation, whitespace and miscellaneous symbols.
All assigned Unicode code points (those matched by \P{Cn}) are part of exactly one Unicode script. All unassigned Unicode code points (those matched by \p{Cn}) are not part of any Unicode script at all.
Very few regular expression engines support Unicode scripts today. Of all the flavors discussed in this tutorial, only the JGsoft engine, Perl and PCRE can match Unicode scripts.
Unicode Blocks :
The Unicode standard divides the Unicode character map into different blocks or ranges of code points. Each block is used to define characters of a particular script like "Tibetan" or belonging to a particular group like "Braille Patterns". Most blocks include unassigned code points, reserved for future expansion of the Unicode standard.
Note that Unicode blocks do not correspond 100% with scripts. An essential difference between blocks and scripts is that a block is a single contiguous range of code points. Scripts consist of characters taken from all over the Unicode character map. Blocks may include unassigned code points (i.e. code points matched by \p{Cn}). Scripts never include unassigned code points. Generally, if you're not sure whether to use a Unicode script or Unicode block, use the script.
E.g. the Currency block does not include the dollar and yen symbols. Those are found in the Basic_Latin and Latin-1_Supplement blocks instead, for historical reasons, even though both are currency symbols, and the yen symbol is not a Latin character. You should not blindly use any of the blocks based on their names. A tool like RegexBuddycan be very helpful with this. E.g. the Unicode property \p{Sc} or \p{Currency_Symbol} would be a better choice than the Unicode block \p{InCurrency} when trying to find all currency symbols.
Not all Unicode regex engines use the same syntax to match Unicode blocks. Perl and Java use the \p{InBlock} syntax as listed above. .NET and XML use \p{IsBlock}instead. The JGsoft engine supports both notations. I recommend you use the "In" notation if your regex engine supports it. "In" can only be used for Unicode blocks, while "Is" can also be used for Unicode properties and scripts, depending on the regular expression flavor you're using. By using "In", it's obvious you're matching a block and not a similarly named property or script.
Do You Need To Worry About Different Encodings?
While you should always keep in mind the pitfalls created by the different ways in which accented characters can be encoded, you don't always have to worry about them. If you know that your input string and your regex use the same style, then you don't have to worry about it at all. This process is called Unicode normalization. All programming languages with native Unicode support, such as Java, C# and VB.NET, have library routines for normalizing strings. If you normalize both the subject and regex before attempting the match, there won't be any inconsistencies.
If you are using Java, you can pass the CANON_EQ flag as the second parameter to Pattern.compile(). This tells the Java regex engine to consider canonically equivalent characters as identical. E.g. the regex à encoded as U+00E0 will match à encoded as U+0061 U+0300, and vice versa. None of the other regex engines currently support canonical equivalence while matching.
沒有留言:
張貼留言